Zakir Naik( Videos )

If you want to watch their videos then you should search in youtube. If you want to watch him alive then go and watch the peace tv (india) I also think if we watch these kind of videos which is related to islam by Zakir Naik then the concept of islam is so clear too us

Zakir Naik is not from the Ahl as-Sunnah wal-Jama'

Thanks for this

Great vidoes. Thanks for sharing.

I hve listened to him and his information is beshak very informative.

i think the videos are extremly informative and add to ones knowledge.

	Quote:
	Zakir Naik is not from the Ahl as-Sunnah wal-Jama'

No matter what he is. He is a Muslim, rather very knowledgeable Muslim. He is giving very good information from very common books. If you feel doubt, please note his reference and go to some library, confirm it. If correct, Alhamdulillah. If incorrect, leave it. Simple.

_________________
Allahoakbar

g hum sunni muslim hain

hum dr zakir naik ko kaisay sun saktay hain

woh to har cheez ka reference deta hai

hum to sunni hain

hum to sunni sunai bato par eitbar kartay hain

hum to sunni hain

muslmano par jo marzi zulm hotay rahain

hum to sunn (freeze) ho kar rahay gaye hain

coz hum sunni hain

agar dr zakir naik quran aur sahi hadeeth ki bijaye waisee hi sunni sunai kahaniya sunain to woh sahi sunni ho ga

phir hum uss ki sunai gay

coz

hum to sunni hain ...

hum suni sunai batain suntay hain.

Crying or Very sad

_________________
Sarfaraz Ahmed
CA Finalist, MIIA (usa), B. Com
http://www.islamhouse.com/
http://www.fatwa-online.com/
http://www.islam-qa.com/index.php?ln=urd
http://www.jamatuddawa.org/

no doubt that Zakir Naik is one of the beat

Thanks man for great videos

Dr Zakir Naik hase huge knowledge, why don't people give him chance to explane in front of opposite peoples. It may take more time but it will be clear. because history is history not our present thinkings those are impsed by some of peoples. any how personnaly i don't like Yazeed and i am against yazeed but i don't believe what Shia says, they don't have any base. they are the one who Killed Hussain R A. if some one ask them that Sone of Hazrat Ali R A agreed to Muvaavia R A and for more than 10 years, annual money was being paid by Muaavia R A. who are otheres? those don't agree with the act of Hassan R A? to whome we should believe Shia or Hazrat Hasan R A ? Investigate and think!

thanks for videosssssssssssssss

Zakir Naik is very intelligent, he could answer every question he is asked.
He studied all the holy Books.

Very intelligent man.

Jazzak Allah brother

very good

Zakir Nalaik

he is bad and he is not a sunni/muslim

Brother Zakir has some great inspiring videos ........... !! thanks for post !!!

He has some great videos:) Smile

Does any body knows what is punishment of Murtad (any one who convert from Islam to other religion) in ISLAM:

ikram661 wrote:

Dr Zakir Naik hase huge knowledge, why don't people give him chance to explane in front of opposite peoples. It may take more time but it will be clear. because history is history not our present thinkings those are impsed by some of peoples. any how personnaly i don't like Yazeed and i am against yazeed but i don't believe what Shia says, they don't have any base. they are the one who Killed Hussain R A. if some one ask them that Sone of Hazrat Ali R A agreed to Muvaavia R A and for more than 10 years, annual money was being paid by Muaavia R A. who are otheres? those don't agree with the act of Hassan R A? to whome we should believe Shia or Hazrat Hasan R A ? Investigate and think!

My brother. Do you know the real meaning of Shia? If you know then please let me know and please tell me which history book it is written that SHIA killed Imam?
I understand that you must get some knowledge of history and also try to understand it? What ever you wrote here is not correct.
MAVIA did fight with Hazrat Ali many times. He is the man who Put The Quran On the stake during the war. ( ist time in islam). Anyway you must read the things logically.

As well zakir naik is concerned he may be good person but he is only competent and preach only one school of thought.

But did he not have knowledge that YAZID ordered to kill IMAM and still he is asking for blessing for him. To have the knowledge and to act on the knowledge with obedience two different things. Human development have 10 parts. 9 parts are for the Obedience and one part is for the knowledge.
anyway GOD IS G8.

bohat achi dua hai allah sai dua hai kai hamain seedhai rastai per chalnai ki toufeeq ata farmaai

Thank you very much.

Salaam,
In my point of view , no body has got perfect knowledge. So you can expect any error or mistake from any level.
A logical point should be accepted and illogical should be rejected. No matter if the speaker is even my own blood relative.

This was a reaction from a student , when Dr. zakir Naik voiced in favor of yazeed!

Quran not enhances but the disaster for the ill-bred (Alquran)
Answering Zakir Naik on his saying raziallah for Yazeed

Mr. Zakir, I am a student and try to learn the truth behind every action which actively affect the humanity in particular and universe in general. We have a lot of sources from where we can learn and establish these facts. The most common among these are the history, religions, and logic.
Being Muslim, I use all these sources and try to drive out the facts and prevailing truth in the light of principles and practices established by Islam. Islam is the only divine religion which has the complete solution of life. No part is left unguided in this code of life. From individual to society it gives the solution of every problem.
From Hazrat Adam (a.s) to Hazrat Mohammad(s), Allaah has sent his messengers to establish a just and fair society, in which rights and obligations of the every individual are defined clearly. The process which started from the first divine code of life has been completed in the shape of Islaam which possesses very clear distinction between the right and wrong. In fact one of the prime notions of every religion and particularly Islaam is the opinion making. I wonder when people, declaring themselves as Muslims are not able to have clarity of thought.
Now coming to the answer of question you gave to a Hindu who was asking about the Karbala. Your answer to the question was, mainly focused on the difference of opinion. I think this opinion is not the new one. This term had been used by those people who either don’t know the truth or they don’t want to know the truth.
If Islam is not able to make the opinion of the people, then why Islam was revealed? If only Rasool Allah(S) was to act upon the religion, then why there was a need to introduce Islam to the world. Why there was a need to reveal Quran .If Rasool Allah is the only the Muslim, then what about the success of noble mission of Islam. Is it a complete disaster?
Islaam says that, it is the last and complete code of life from Allaah. Is Islaam not able to distinguish between Haq and Baatil and can’t tell that what is right and what is wrong? Will you declare the battle of Badr and Uhd to be difference of opinion? Were both parties in the battle of Makkah, for which Quran says, Haq has prevailed and Baatil has vanished. Was it wrong to say this because it can be difference of opinion as per your kind criteria?
Those people who fought against Hazrat Ali (a.s), they were also not distinguished by your Islaam and they got the protection of your difference of opinion formula. I think you are very much informed with the number of Muslims killed in these fights. They were not less than hundred thousand. What sort of this difference of opinion is, that Quran says to protect a single human is same as to protect the whole humanity. But your difference of opinion formula is killing hundred thousand people. They are not just the killed ones, with them thousands of children and women got unshielded. Thousands of families and houses lost their protectors. And you are saying that this was just the difference of opinion.
I ask from you that, can you say that the difference between Hinduism and Islaam, is the difference of opinion. Was Babari Mosque destruction an action of difference of opinion?
Is difference between Christianity and Islaam a, difference of opinion?
Is difference between Judaism and Islaam a, difference of opinion?
Well you will say that these are different religions, hence they are out of context.
Then I will ask you, that the Islaam preached by King Akbar was just a difference of opinion? Is the fight by Hamid Karzai Government on Taalibaan is difference of opinion. Is Islaam of Kamaal Atta Turk and the Islaam taught by you has only the difference of opinion. And if this is true, Then I will request you to windup your channel, stop preaching, because difference of opinion will always exist. And according to you it has no effect. Then you are not only wasting your precious time and energy but also that of many people who participate in these programs.
Now let’s come to the blasphemous action you done to Islaam by saying, may Allaah be pleased with the name of Yazeed ?? Tell me; are the deeds of yazeed not evident to you or anyone knowing history? Was he not an adulterer, and drinker? Did he not use to destroy the values of Islaam? Can by any ethical standard he be declared as a good human or even a human. Are his cruelties hidden from the eyes of history? Did you forget the occasion of “Hirra” when the blood of Muslims was declared as permissible by yazeed. When yazeed attached Kabaa and its ghilaaf was burned by his army. History says that thousands of the virgin girls were raped in holly city of Madina. Are these actions still not enough to declare him a cruel and ferocious? And what about praying for a cruel, brutal and murderer?. Will Allaah be happy on praying for Zaalimeen on which he has always cursed in Quran? Have you never read sayings of Prophet, that to be quite against Zaalim is same as to commit Zulm? And you are praying for him. Your action is not less than that Zaalim yazeed according to the sayings of Prophet and principles underlined in Quran.
You said it was a political issue. Dear Doctor Naik, to be more precise Dr. Naive, because you have showed a highest level of naivety here. You declared this war a political one. If not from other factors at least you should have pondered over the volume of rival armies. A maximum of 100, Hussiani against the minimum 33,000 yazeedis. Does this equation say anything to you? Are these the statistics of war? If still it’s a political war, can you expect from those persons for whom prophet said that they are the leaders of Paradise. Do they have not enough wisdom that being very less in number they fight with the superpower of that time just as a political agenda?
Do children and unarmed women come for Political wars? Can you let the murderers of 6 month children go by just saying the wage terms of political war and difference of opinion.
And if you are pig-headed enough to bring all the blames to anyone else that, it was not Yazeed, who ordered this massacre and he did not know. And you are the people who in context of the fairness and justice of 2nd caliph quote his sayings, that if a dog dies on the bank of Euphrates then he is responsible. Unfortunately this brutality happened on the bank of Euphrates and those were not only the human but the respected men and women from the Prophet’s family whose piety and sacredness is well known to everyone. Also if he was not agreed on this massacre, why he imprisoned the family of prophet and ordered his armies to take them to his palace.
If all this is not enough for you to make any opinion, then I challenge you and let you chose any area, from Quran, Hadees, History and Logic and we will have a debate over this issue and Inshallah Truth will surely prevail and curse is upon the falsehood and upon those who deny the righteous path.