America's Fake Success in IRAQ

George Bush’s image would have been very different if he had a different (say Russian) army at his disposal.

Some occupied countries are easy to pacify. Some are difficult. Iraq is the easiest. In fact Iraqis don’t need to be pacified in the first place. All you have to do is avoid irrational fears about imaginary dangers lest you shoot unarmed civilians. This is what happened with US and the matter escalated from there.

Now you know why US Army didn’t get “success” in Vietnam!

Americans intoxicated with superiority complex overestimate, overrate US Army’s role in Iraq.

The real test is in Afghanistan. Americans don’t notice the difference between Iraq and Afghanistan. Iraqis are very pliable people. Iraqi forces do the job and American eunuchs take the credit. Afghans are not like that.

Let us not blame Yankees. Westerners are made for philanthropy not soldiering.

Certainly Iraq is easy. Iraq fought Iran to a standstill, and conquered other countries in the region. If Iraq is so weak, Iran must really be feeble. Yes, and everyone knows what a powerhouse Afghanistan is.

Iraq conquered in 3 weeks, Afghanistan conquered in 2 weeks. If the US just left then, would you call them weak? Or are they weak by trying to prop up defeated country?

A falsehood is as good as the truth if somebody believes it?